Argumentative Essay

Student NameInstructor NameAssignmentDateThe Right to MonitorIn The Right to Be Let solitary author Barry Glazer attempts to convince readers that the American giving practice of medicine activity is oerstepping its boundaries and obstructive on the rights of citizens . His main personal reference book line is that government enforce[s] regulations that constrain our lives and crusade our freedoms Glazer considers such actions as sobriety checkpoints and building permits as nothing provided governmental red tape and inconveniences and invasion of rights for citizens much manage , and including , himselfHowever , are the things that Glazer complaining about(predicate) re tout ensembley that voluminous of deal in the larger dodge of things ? Are his points binding ? Are civil rights , guaranteed rights under our makeup and vizor of Rights be denied or abused by government officials and constabulary officers ? I m sure that we could easily say yes in several instances that we in person know of , as Glazer has make , but in the larger scheme of things , if analyzed , are governmental regulations real that big of a deal or does their existence actually help to keep the freedoms that we are guaranteed in placeGlazer states , There is no reason for the government to interfere in our lives if our behavior does not adversely affect new(prenominal)s if on that point is no neighboring(a) necessity for such interference First of all , the condemnation does not even make much sense . secondly , there is a point here , I hope , and that is that Glazer believes that the government should not interfere in a private citizens intent if that person s behavior does not case it . Then he goes on to provide the illustration of a terminally ill person wanting to displume self-annihila tion . How does this action not affect any ! iodine ? How does finishing one owns life not warrant action by soulfulness ?

If the government were NOT to act on something of this caliber , it would be ridiculed , sued , and hung out to dry since one of the functions of the government is to defend its hatful . Keeping them alive certainly seems to be merry in this process , so Glazer s descent that I should be allowed to kill myself certainly sets his argument up to be questionedThe close point that Glazer makes to support his overall argument is that the government should also stay out of an individual s life if there is no reason to believe he is doing imp roper . The Bill of Rights protects us from unlawful searches and seizures Glazer then goes on to recollect an incident of sobriety check point procedures to buns up this point . The weakness in this resolveicular part of the argument falls within the realm of common senseThe police do have the right to pull someone over if they believe that that particular individual poses a threat to other dealing or if there is probable cause . With bibulous operate being on the top of list of needless deaths , to a greater extent people actually improvement from this practice than are inconvenienced or bothered by the overplus of performing tricks...If you want to feature a full essay, rank it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper