Augustuss reforms sought to re- afford roman letters governing tree trunk as a monarchy in all but name. How thriving were his reforms in stabilizing Roman authorities? Was Augustus an ideal policy-m analogousg leader or a tyrant? After defeating opinion Anthony and Cleopatra in 31 B.C., Octavian was the solely individual capable of stabilizing the Roman Re ordinary covering fire to how it had been prior to Caesars death. Although to the public it appeared that he had given back great power to the senators, he was still in control how the Republic operated. This was referable to the point that the senate granted him special civil and military powers. by proletarian of this he was able to stay in power and book of account the Senate to continue with its traditions. He furthered this by looking and play acting as if he was just another public servant, never acting as if he was in charge. He furthered his plaza by creating Praetorian Guard, which was me ant to provide security and prevent rebellion in Rome, and made improvements to their standard of living that ensured loyalty to him. He won popularity with the poor citizens by using his own money to filth ones palms food for them.
I believe that Augustus was a perfect political leader for that time. He able to stabilize a government that was shattered by civil war and render himself as ruler by making it appear that the people cherished it that way. He didnt try to take over and establish his own form of rule, even though he had the heart to do so. He placed him in a position to be loved by but at the aki n time he implemented policies that helped t! he people. Lynn Hunt et al., The Making of the western: Peoples and Cultures, 3rd ed. (Boston: Bedford/St. Martins, 2009), (Pg. 165 167)If you want to get a full(a) essay, say it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment