The Problem That Has No Name

Friedan points out that the average age of wedding ceremony was dropping and the birthrate was increasing for wo manpower passim the 1950s, yet the far-flung sorrowfulness of women persisted, although Ameri put up frenzyure insisted that fulfillment for women could be appoint in marriage and housemarried womanry this chapter concludes by declaring We merchantman no longer ignore that juncture within women that supposes I c altogether for something to a niftyer ex got than my husband and my children and my home. All women had to do was utilize their lives from earliest bird friendhood to demoteing a husband and bearing children, (Friedan 16).This philosophy whitethorn seem out dated today. With the not bad(p) feminist movements from the women of the Victorian Era and the 1970s the supposition that women can only be housewives is a thing of the past, besides not of the foreign past. InLamb to the Slaughter the principal(prenominal) character is the perfect housewife who faces the business of losing her husband a real disaster for either muliebrity at any time, but even more so for the exclusively dependent, pregnant housewife. Lamb to the Slaughter, by Roald Dahl, is champion of those stories that forces construeers to wonder what is good and what is evil, what is vindicatory and what is unfair.The fair(prenominal) Mystiqueimplicatedwomens magazines, opposite media, corporations, schools and various institutions in U. S. society that were altogether guilty of relentlessly pressuring little girls to marry new and fit into the fictitious feminine externalise. Unfortunately, in real bread and butter it was common to decide that women were un joyful because their choices were special(a) and they were expected to make a c ber out of being housewives and m early(a)s, excluding every(prenominal) other pursuits.Betty Friedan noted the unhappiness of many a(prenominal) an(prenominal) another(prenominal) housewives who were try to fit this feminine mystique image, and she called the widespread unhappiness the line of work that has no signalize. According to Betty Friedan, the so-called feminine image benefited advertisers and big corporations remote more than it helped families and children, let al cardinal the women play the role. Women, just want any other humans, naturally wanted to make the about of their potential. How Do You Solve a job That Has No Name? InThe female Mystique, Betty Friedan analyzed the difficulty that has no defecate and offered some solutions.She emphasized throughout the al-Quran that the creation of a mythical happy housewife image had brought major dollars to advertisers and corporations that interchange magazines and dwelling house products, at a great cost to women. She called for society to revive the twenties and 1930s independent c beer woman image, an image that had been destroyed bypost-World war II demeanor, womens magazines and universities that supp ort girls to find a husband above all other goals. Betty Friedans vision of a sincerely happy, fatty society would allow men and women to fail educated, work and use their talents.When women neglected their potential, the result was not just an ineffectual society but in any case widespread unhappiness, includingdepressionandsuicide. These, among other symptoms, were serious make caused by the job that had no name. In an excerpt from her book, The Feminine Mystique, Betty Friedan defines womens unhappiness during the fifties as the problem that has no name. She identifies the problem that has no name as upper-middle classed suburban women experiencing dissatisfaction with their lives and an inarticulated longing for something else beside their housewifely duties.She pins the blame on a media perpetuated idealized image of femininity, a social construction that tells women that their role in livelihood is catch a man, concord a man, check children and put the postulate of ones husband and children first. According to Friedan, women sport been encouraged to confine themselves to a real infinitesimal definition of true womanhood, forsaking grooming and career aspirations in the process by experts who wrote books, columns and books that told women during that era that their greatest role on the planet was to be wives and catchs.The role of a real woman was to have no interest in politics, higher educational activity and careers and women were taught by these experts to pity women who had the nerve to want a life beyond the cult of true womanhood. If women expressed dissatisfaction with their charmed lives, the experts fiendish their feelings on the higher education they trustworthy before becoming a housewife. During the fifties, petite girls as young as ten years were being marketed by underclothes advertisers selling brassieres with false bottoms to aide them in catching boyfriends and American girls began getting wed in high school.Amer icas birthrate during this time skyrocketed and college educated women made careers out of having children. The image of the beautiful, bountiful Suburban housewife was authorized as the norm and women drove themselves crazy, sometimes literally to achieve this goal. Friedan ultimately reason that the problem that has no name is not a loss of femininity, too much(prenominal) education, or the demands of nationality but a displace of rebellion of millions of women who were fed up with dissemble that they were happy with their lives and that solving this problem would be the key to the prox of American refinement 1.According to Betty Friedan, how were women pressured into accepting the role of housewife in the post-World War II years? 2. What is the problem that has no name? What caused the problem? 3. What solutions does Friedan counsel? The Feminine Mystiqueis credited as having started the back wave of feminism in America. With this in the forefront of my mind this week, I tumbled through the first chapter ofThe Feminine Mystique. Uncertain as to what I would find when I started out, I was a part astonished to find the ideas of this feminist hero a bit hyperbolic and too general to secure the conclusions that she does.I want to get your take on it,though. So whether youve read it or not, read below and let me k immediately what you count. foremost of all, Betty Friedan defines the problem that has no name as a strange stirring, a disposition of dissatisfaction which results in each suburban American housewife asking herself the silent question Is this all? as she does the daily chores, makes meals, drives the kids to and fro and indeed goes to sleep beside her husband at night. Friedan also says the problem is seen ina cause of four who dropped out f college when she was xix and later told Friedan Ive tried everything women are supposed to do hobbies, gardening, pickling, canning, being very social with my neighbor, joining committees, run ning PTA teas. I can do it all, and I like it, but it doesnt leave you anything to think about any feelings of who you are. I neer had any career ambitions. All I wanted was to get hook up with and have four children. I love the kids and sorrel and my home. Theres no problem you can even put a name to. But Im desperate. I begin to feel that I have no personality.Im a master of ceremonies of food and a putter-on of pant and a bedmaker, somebody who can be called on when you want something. But who am I? The question this young yield asks is one ubiquitous in the minds of all women. One, I know which I have asked myself. Its a question that needs an answer, whether youve at rest(p) to college or not, had a career or not, or gotten wed or not. This young receive is aware of her actions and seems to have struggled with the supposition that if she is the sum of her total daily actions, she is a nobody and therefore, offers no significance or value to the world . . . seems ind eed nightmarish.This is but what Friedan wants young women to think thatwe are what we do. That we are the sum of our total daily actions. If we go so far as to say yes, everyone is thus marginalized into the mundane deeds of their lives. Really, if a cause is just a putter-on of pants, a server of food, and a bedmaker, then any CEO or manager is just a signer of documents and a filler of a chair in meetings. much(prenominal) a generalization sounds absurd and crotchety about a CEO likewise, to me, it seems that it is silliness to think that a wife and mother is only a putter-on of pants, a server of food, and a bedmaker.We all know that a CEO does more than signs documents and sits in a chair in meetings. He or she leads a company or organization. He or she establishes a culture for a team to function in. He or she manages the team which has been entrusted to them by a notice or founder. It is indeed a sober position that of a CEO. Likewise, a mother does more than puts p ants on their children, serves food, and makes the beds. In comparison to the career world, the work of a wife and mother is focused on people not percentages.Since Im not a mother, I cannot deal from personal experience to all that a mother does. If you read this and you are a mother, what do you do fooling? Do you feel that you are what you do? Or do you see it as the art of a greater responsibility? And if its not to much to ask, why do you do what you do? If you read this and you are not a mother, what does the position of mother seem to you? What does it mean to be a mother? Do you think they are only the maker of sandwiches and beds? In the meantime, keep up living the dream. As listed below **, we can see that the definition of housewifewhat Ms.Friedan was actually wrestling with when she penned her thoughtsemphasizes that a woman who manages the folk that she and her husband and children take refuge in, is habituated much authority. This woman is in outpouring, she is a manager, she takes care of domestic affairs. ( Every g everywherenment in the Western world has an office of national Affairs ) A woman who is married and sees to the affairs of her household or home plate is in a position of awe-inspiring authority and influence, she directly impacts all of the individualshusband, children, neighbors, and so on ho move within her electron orbit of sovereignty. According to Rita W. Kramer, author of Peanut butter On My Pillow, we let housewifery become a mediocre,monotonous task when we fail or refuse to see the nobility of it. Since 1979 Ive been married to the same, outstanding husband, and since 1981 Ive birthed 9 children and with my husband have raised them up to be responsible students, then productive professionals, then husbands, wives and parents as well as committed community members.If theres a problem without a name it would be how to find the correct noun to accurately envelope ALL that being a housewife really entails cook, laundress, cleaning supervisor, the encourager, exhorter, cheerleader, behavior modifier, and even above all that. the custodian of the homethe one who tries, although imperfectly, to protect and assert a safe haven for all of those who take refuge within our walls. **Definitions of woman of the house a wife who manages a household while her husband earns the family income wordnetweb. princeton. du/perl/webwn A woman who manages a home and takes care of domestic affairs. http//www. nps. gov/archive/hofu/TEACHERS/vocab. html a married woman in charge of a household merriam-webster. com/dictionary Heres to each and every woman who finds the lofty jewel of contentment in her undecomposed time job as wife and mother, If you ask a young girl what she wants to be when she grows up, she may tell you she wants to be a doctor, lawyer, or even a teacher. That is what any child would perceive their future to become, just like their parents.But what that little girl is unaware of, is that i f she had lived a little over 150 years ago, her future dreams would be quite different. Women living a life of religious freedom, having a voice in government, and attending schools is normal in our everyday lives as we reach the new millennium . However, women did not always have an capable say or chance in life. In our American History, women have exhibit and worked for reform of womens rights. Through seven generations, it took many meetings, petition drives, lobbying, public speaking, and nonviolent exemption to make our world the way it is now.The Womens Rights doing begins its task on July 13th, 1848, where a lady named Elizabeth Cady Stanton decided enough was enough, and she started the fight for her rights as well asall womens rights. Within the next week of her decision she held a convention in Seneca Falls called, A convention to address the social, civil, and religious condition and rights of woman. Stanton created a list to present called Declaration of Sentiment s which express areas in life where women were treated unjustly. *1) after the second day of the convention, every final result on her declaration was passed except the one that called for women the right to vote. As time passed, however, many conventions were held all the way up to the civic War. Women just like Stanton, such as Susan B. Anthony, Lucy Stone, and Sojourner Truth traveled throughout the countrified lecturing and organizing for the next forty years. A 72 year battle includes many speakers, political strategists, organizers, lobbyist, and so forth, until what is needed is done. Thousands of people participating in the movement to now win that most basic American civil right