Case #1: Cca (Board of Directors)

BUSN7045 Corporate Governance moorage reflect 1 Jiachen Lyu u5264027 1 Evaluation of the Board of Directors of Coca-Cola Amatil Jiachen Lyu Student ID u5264027 1. Basic digest a macro perspective From the publicly open information, the member root of the Board Of Directors ( configuration) of Coca-Cola Amatil (CCA) give the sack be summarised as the following table ( send back 1- 1). It can be easily seen that non-executive directors account for the majority of the board.According to Tricker (1994), this particular stem is of a typical American kind, which is specifically designed to emphasis the emancipation among members in the board and their loyalty to the sh atomic number 18holders. Table 1-1 Composition of Board of Directors Compan y Name Total direc tor No. Executi ve director Nonexecuti ve directo r Composition of non-executive directors Exper t direct ors Chairma n of other compani es Investment agency representati ves Individu al investor s Coca- Cola Amatil 9 1 8 8 2 3 0 However, it is worth noting that this particular formation is a take of the highly developed American capital market.In such a market, the absolute frequency of foreign takeover is so common a market phenomenon that masks the overlook of BODs function. In American companies steering practice, people center more on centralisation and expert system, which reduces the importance of executive directors. canvass with the U. S. , both the turnover of Australian stock market and the frequency of hostile takeover are low, which posts a shadow on the adaption of Colas American empirical practice into Australia. 2. Focus on non-executive directorsThe non-executive directors are directors who are employed from the outside. They are normally specialist in areas such as strategic management, finance, investment, legal and public relation. In order to better gather the duties of a BOD, National Association of Corporate Directors Blue Ribbon bang emphasises that each director shoul d contribute his fellowship in at least a field listed below (1) accounting and finance, (2) judgment, (3) management skills, (4) crisis response, (5) industrial knowledge, (6) amaze in international markets, (7) leadership, and (8) strategic vision.According to this point of BUSN7045 Corporate Governance Case Study 1 Jiachen Lyu u5264027 2 view, it can be analysed from the information procurable on the CCAs website as Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Appraisal of CCAs non-executive directors D. G . I. A . C. B . A. F . M. J . G. K . W. K. D. M . Judgment Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Management skills Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Crisis Response Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y industrial Knowledge N N N Y Y Y N N Experience in the international market N N N Y Y Y N NLeadership Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Strategic vision Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Abbreviation David Gonski (D. G. ), Ilana Atlas (I. A. ), Catherine Brenner (C. B. ), Anthony Froggatt (A. F. ), Martin Jansen (M. J. ), Geoffrey Kelly (G. K. ), Wal King (W. K. ), David Meiklejohn (D. K. ). From Table 2-1, it is clear that some finance and law background non-executive directors (i. e. D. G. and I. A. ) lack of knowledge in beverage industry and realize little experience in international markets.When they were facing situations that need industrial judgement and global vision, the delimit of their knowledge would be likely to hurt the interest of shareholders. Most non-executive directors, ascribable to their insufficient knowledge more or less the inner working of the company, tend to trust on financial criteria rather than innovation criteria to evaluate the long-term management of the enterprise, which may lead to short-sighted decisions and further hurt the goodwill and innovation of CCA.Furthermore, close to aforementioned non-executive directors are quite busy as they may be managers of other companies or partners of investment banks, they therefore do not comport sufficient time to collect detailed management information about CCA. Consequently, the most proba ble channel of their source of CCAs information is from the managers. Ironically, eon the purpose of establishing a BOD is to solve principleagent problems between the ownership and management, the realizable information asymmetry between manager and BOD (thanks to the large counterbalance of busy nonexecutive directors) may result this vehicle into null.From a strategic perspective, on the other hand, all these non-executive directors as experts in finance, investment, legal issues and science have long term experience, most of whom are over 50 forms old. They can provide more specific knowledge and advice in terms of strategic management. This is the positive effect of having eight nonexecutive directors in the BOD of CCA. References Bol Tricker. , Corporate Governance, An International View, p. 20, Prentice Hall, 1994.