Appeasement Essay -- History European Historical Essays

Appeasement The task of explaining why appeasement, has been continuously addressed by historians oer the years. To date, in that respect is still no single cause identified. Nonetheless there is however a general consensus amongst historians that the frightful events of world contend one, distilled a sense of fear and regret amongst British monastic order, and consequently Britain strived to baffle every future war, through whatever means necessary. In the aftermath of universe of discourse state of war 1, lay a mutual understanding between the British government and society that never again should a catastrophe such as World War 1 occur, it was described as the war to end all wars reinforcing the view that it was a cataclysmic event which should never be re-enacted upon society. British public became disillusioned with the use of force in international relations and as a result sought an access code consisting of an effective system of collective security. In post war socie ty anti-war books, films and poems all became increasingly well liked and several pacifist insistence groups were formed with the sole admit of achieving peaceful solutions to international problems. These groups were known as The Peace Pledge Union, The Peace Society and the No More War Movement. World War 1 essentially left Britain in a state of mourning, and accordingly thousands of war monuments were erected, and an annual day of mourning and retrospection was established, known as Remembrance Sunday. This was an attempt to pay tribute to those heroes alienated in the war and to act as a subtle monitor of the devastation caused by the war in a bid to prevent any future conflict. As a result of the desolation a common consensus was becoming apparent amid the general public, which was that, there were no create societal gains from the war and the obvious economic, and political decline of the country showed no gains in that sector either. Hence the reduction of arms and peac e became pick out winners in elections. Appeasement can be defined as a disposition to avoid conflict by judicious concession and negotiation. Neville Chamberlain noted that the British public would not wish nor accept another(prenominal) war. Therefore the British government sought to follow a indemnity of appeasement. However, everyone did not share the acceptance of the polity of appeasement. Looking on with hindsight numerous historians befool condemned the actions of Chamberlai... ...nland. There are mixed opinions towards this form _or_ system of government, and the question why historians have debated appeasement continuously over the passing decades. Many believe that Chamberlains policy of appeasement was fuled by a desire to do everything in his provide possible to avoid war, and his belief that all European powers shared the fowl feeling. The catastrophic events of World War one set in a deep fear and hatred of war among many. It is also felt that Chamberlain fo llowed the policy of appeasement as a means to buy some measure as he realised that British defences were hopelessly inadequate, as British military strength had been greatly reduced due to the commitment of disarmament. raze at the time of the Anschluss Britain was declared unprepared for war. Therefore to conclude, whatever the reasons for the unrelenting policy of appeasement, it can be said that appeasement with the sole aim of preventing war did not succeed, however what it was seen to do was prolong the inevitable. Many potently feel that the continual demands of Hitler were flared by the lack of opposition, and his continual greed for expansion, his demands were seldom attacked, simply given into with little hesitancy.