Effects of Education Context on Curriculum

Effects of Education Context on Curriculum1a How hind end the platform offer and delivery vary according to the education and training mise en scene or purpose?The education and training context in this voice varies according to community outreach venues, specifically chosen to reach the p arnts of children needing ESOL teaching, who have broken in levels of first oral communication literacy and so require potentially different direction of supporting oral communication scholarship. Different approaches to curriculum traffic pattern atomic number 18 press release to influence how the teacher develops the syllabus or the scheme of employ, because this allow impinge on how they select each topic to be taught, how sequence topics and themes, style stages, establish on whether this is a process or product found syllabus, speculative/ functional syllabus, Communicative Syllabus, Top-based syllabus.1 For example, a content-based syllabus, based maybe on tumefy-formed st ructure, would be organised according to sequencing structures, age a communicative syllabus might be much functional or based on identified needs.Syllabus spirit is star of the means by which teachers grassful approach the process of facilitating language information2. However, in language teaching, syllabus design has been largely neglected. Curricula are ways of organising learning, indicating lesson content and learning progress, while syllabuses are much more concerned with what actually goes on in the classroom, forming damp of ongoing ontogenesis, review and refinement of the syllabus3 to meet the needs of the learner while satisfying the requirements of the institution or awarding body. Syllabus design is the picking and grading of content, and is argued to also relate to the plectrum of tasks and materials4. Because of the complexity of language learning, selection of tasks and selection of content may be different than in other types of learning.5 Lesson plannin g involves reinforcement with frequent feedback on learning, delayed feedback, allowing trial and error, and praise, tag and prizes.6 All of these means of ordering learning are focused on what and how the ESOL student will learn.7In this context, the focus is on ESOL Keeping up with the Children Family Learning, and so the curriculum is designed with this in mind, but the needs of learners in ESOL can vary, including a more academic approach, much(prenominal) as ESOL in FE8, or intensive ESOL training for Job Search, or Vocational ESOL (eg ESOL engraft in something else, like Catering). This would then require a more functional syllabus which would be focused much more on vocabulary, and schemes of work would take this into account, practicing nominate elements of communication rather than simply grammar. Dynamic language learning is more complex than simply the repetition of sounds, words and condemn structures, and so the communicative approach may be much fall in suited.9 However, all of these approaches could also potentially serve to help ESOL students integrate into the tender world as well.10However, the syllabus design and development in this model is also constructed within the requirements of the awarding body, thus requiring that students learn sufficient and in the right manner to meet the assessment requirements, and develop a oecumenic English vocabulary which covers personal details and experiences, work, education training, housing, family and friends, health, transport, weather, buying goods, leisure, UK society. The ground of such learning is significant, and cannot all be developed in one term, but the provision of vocabulary lists, and the implementation of constructive methods of learning can be built into the syllabus to allow for ongoing linguistic development which builds upon learning session by session.11,121bHow might the different approaches to curriculum design you have outlined influence the outcomes for individuals an d multitudes?The kinds of outcomes which relate to the curriculum here allow looking at what skills, vocabulary and language structures will have been learnt in the different educational settings or contexts13. For example, the work or occupational based ESOL courses will be limited to the kinds of vocabulary which relate to work activities and practices, and will be quite specialised, while the kinds of programmes which are to do with family learning are likely to relate more strongly to more practical language which can be used in the home and in key scenarios such as learning how to communicate with school teachers and other batch about the child. But over-defined objectives can limit learning, rather than support the dynamical forms of learning which are often more suited to ESOL.14 One of the problems is that the direct contexts for learning, particularly if they are very specialised, such as the occupational learning context, or even learning English as a tourist, can lea d to bad habits, because language learning is a process of ontogeny attitudes and habits.15Thus the habits that have been developed in one context, may arrive at or hinder the use of language and the learning and development of pull ahead language skills in another setting. However, supporting a degree of learning awareness and self-direction in learning is important, and depending on whether the curriculum is instructive or communicative, this could be more easily achieved or else become more difficult. A communicative approach is much more focused on the needs of the learner, and so is more dynamic, and more likely to foster self-direction in language learning. 16 Self-direction and the identification of structural regularities in language, such as learning applied grammar, can be enhanced by more directed learning approaches, or by a salmagundi of content-focused syllabi and communicative approaches17, which has been the authors experience in their current context. contemp t the strengths of different approaches, the context of learning is very significant in how and how well students learn.18,19 However, language learning curricula, and the impacts of different approaches to teaching and learning, are still comparatively poorly researched, and it would be useful to have more, diverse research and casing studies which identify what kinds of approaches have been proven best in which settings.20, 21ReferencesArmitage, A., Bryant, R., Dunhill, R., Hammersley, M., Hayes, D., Hudson, A., Lawes, S. (1999) educational activity and grooming in Post-Compulsory Education, Open University Press.Brillinger, K. (2003) From Theory to Practice Creating Intermediate ESL Reading Materials found on Current SLA investigate and Theories, Newsletter of the Association of Teachers of English as a Second Language of Ontario, 29(3), 1-6Burns, A. (2006) Surveying landscapes in braggy ESOL research, philology and Education, 17, 97105Curzon, L. B. (1997), Teaching in Furt her Education an epitome of Principles andPractice, (5th ed.). London Cassell.Dagenais, D. Beynon, J. and Mathis, N. (2008) Intersections of Social Cohesion, Education, and Identity in Teachers, Discourses, and Practices Pedagogies An foreign Journal 3 (2) 85 108.Ewald, J.D. (2004) A classroom forum on small group work L2 learners see, and change, themselves. Language Awareness 13 (3) 163-179.Ferris, D.R. (1994) Lexical and syntactic features of ESL compose by students at different levels of L2 proficiency. TESOL Quarterly 28 (2) 414-420.Lochtman, K. (2002) Oral restorative feedback in the foreign language classroom how it affects interaction in uninflected foreign language teaching International Journal of Educational Research 37 (3-4) 271-283.Long, M. (1996) The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. and Bhatia, T. (eds) Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (413-468) San Diego, CA donnish Press.Morgan, B. (1997) Identity and into nation linking dynamic processes in an ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly 31 (3) 431-450.Morrice, L. (2007) long learning and the social integration of refugees in the UK the significance of social capital, International Journal of Lifelong Education, 26(2), 155-172Reece, I. and Walker, S. (2000). Teaching, Training and Learning a practical guide.Sunderland duty Education Publishers.Roberts, C. Baynham, M. (2006) Introduction to the special issue Research in adult ESOL, Linguistics and Education, 17, 1-5Rogers, A. (1996), Teaching Adults, 2nd edition, Buckingham Open University Press.Widodo, H.P. (2006) Approaches and procedures for teaching grammar. English Teaching Practice and Critique. 5 (1) 122-141.Zamel, V. and Spack, R. (2006) Teaching Multilingual Learners across the Curriculum beyond the ESOL Classroom and Back Again. Journal of Basic Writing (CUNY), 25 (2) 126-152.1Footnotes1 Nunan, D. (1988)2 Nunan (ibid)3 Nunan (ibid)4 Nunan (ibid)5 Zamel, V. and Spack, R. (2006)6 Reece, I. and Walker, S. (2000). P 1067 Armitage, A., Bryant, R., Dunhill, R., Hammersley, M., Hayes, D., Hudson, A., Lawes, S. (1999)8 Curzon, L. B. (1997),910 Morrice, L. (2007)11 Morgan, B. (1997)12 Lochtman, K. (2002)13 Burns, A. (2006)14 Reece and Walker (ibid)15 Reece and Walker (ibid)16 Rogers, A. (1996),17 Widodo, H.P. (2006)18 Long, M. (1996)19 Ewald, J.D. (2004)20 Roberts, C. Baynham, M. (2006)21 Brillinger, K. (2003)